[MonoDevelop] Planning MonoDevelop 1.0

Lluis Sanchez lluis at ximian.com
Sat Nov 25 13:56:28 EST 2006

> >       * NUnit: It can be considered feature complete for 1.0. The only
> >         missing issue to resolve is what to do with the NUnit
> >         dependency. Right now the add-in can't be built with recent
> >         NUnit versions since they have breaking changes. I 
> > talked about
> >         this with Charlie Poole in the Mono summit and he suggested to
> >         embed the most recent NUnit dlls into the add-in, 
> > since even if
> >         the API has some breaking changes, new NUnit versions 
> > can still
> >         run tests written for all the previous versions.
> For development purposes, I suggest moving to the NUnit 2.4 Beta code.
> There are interface differences between 2.0 and 2.2.8 and further changes
> from 2.2.8 to 2.4. The 2.4 TestRunner interface could still change a little,
> but only in the direction of simplification.

Yep, if NUnit is backwards compatible regarding running tests, it makes
sense to include the latest version in MD.


More information about the Monodevelop-list mailing list