[Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu

[Petit Eric]

deb http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu:/Mono/Ubuntu_9.10_standard/
./
don't work for you ?
Are you using x86_64, as i said is broken ?
At least you can took the source files who are ok and use it in
lunchpad ppa of ubuntu

2010/1/14 Chorn Sokun <chornsokun at gmail.com>:
> Totally agree with @daniel except that I am not agree the part where said we
> not thanks/appreciate Ubuntu team.
> I don't know about the rest of the world but for me and the people that I
> introduce to /talk with them about Ubuntu they all appreciate the great
> afford and policing put into get this excellent distro for us.
>
> Perhap using Window & develop in .NET Framework with just click and get
> thing work make me junior coder a lazy labor. However to abandon Windows
> camp and join Linux my option is to pick popular Linux distro and can do my
> job on it that how I feel having mono ready and up to date on the Ubuntu
> (official support :D) would be a big plus.
>
> Build one run every where !
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Chorn Sokun
> +855 12 222718
>
> http://chornsokun.wordpress.com
> http://twitter.com/csokun
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:58 PM, daniel <trampster at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The ubuntu devs package and deploy for their release which happens every
>> 6 months. it is insane to say its up to them to package version released
>> between OS versions.
>>
>> Ubuntu comes with a packaged version on gnome do, which is fine, however
>> I choose to use a more recent version of gnome do so I use a PPA which
>> is supplied by the developers  (not the ubuntu devs)
>>
>> The fact that ubuntu/devian developers package mono for you for its OS
>> releases is a bonus, did Microsoft package up mono  and include it in
>> its Windows 7? NO! did Apple package up mono and include it in snow
>> leopard? no. So ubuntu is helping you guys out hugely but do you thank
>> them? no, you just expect more of them.
>>
>> I also use Chrome in ubuntu. Its not in the repros at all, when I wanted
>> to install chrome did google say... O sorry its up to ubuntu/debian to
>> package chrome for you, its not our fault if they don't. No, they
>> packaged it themselves and even provided different channels so I can
>> decide exactly how cutting edge I want to be.
>>
>> So you have to worry about a newer version breaking existing
>> applications, how is this different from on any other operating system?
>>
>> It's not up to the ubuntu devs to package new versions of mono for exist
>> OS releases, its up to the mono project to do this and provide it as a
>> PPA.
>>
>> The question you need to ask is, how important is the largest desktop
>> linux distribution to the mono project.
>>
>> At my work we started to port a .net application to mono, however it
>> need to run on ubuntu (8.04) do you know what version of mono is in
>> 8.04 its 1.2.6, everything for our app was supported in mono 2.4 but
>> mono 1.2.6? not even close. So we abandoned our efforts, I'm sure their
>> are lots of other people out there with similar stories. Those of us who
>> use ubuntu feel a little bit like second class citizens.
>>
>>
>>
>> B.R. wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Bálint Kardos <kardosbalint at gmail.com
>> > <mailto:kardosbalint at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >     Hi Stephen,
>> >
>> >     Fact 1: the provider decides on the virtualized platforms, not me.
>> >     They have Fedora, Ubuntu or Debian systems ready.
>> >
>> >     Fact 2: I've used Debian and Fedora for a decade, so I'm more
>> >     familiar with Ubuntu as with SuSe.
>> >
>> >     Fact 3: I've started working on merging all my sites/servers back
>> >     to Windows 2008.
>> >     It is a sad story, but the lack of real features on mono (Web
>> >     Services still has bugs for years, the LINQ implementation is a
>> >     horror etc.) makes it more and more hard to use it as a real
>> >     Production (not a toy playground) platform.
>> >
>> >
>> >     üdvözlettel
>> >     with regards
>> >
>> >     Kardos Bálint
>> >     _______________________________________
>> >     http://skaelede.hu 10 (0xA) év a magyar weben
>> >
>> >
>> > If there are web services bugs, file bugs--if nobody knows about them,
>> > they can't get fixed. Also, clarify what you mean by LINQ? LINQ to
>> > Objects is pretty simple and there's only so many ways to implement
>> > that, so I'm not sure how you can lay claim to that being a horror.
>> > LINQ to SQL is a different story, and a huge effort that is only now
>> > beginning to be integrated into Mono properly. You could also file
>> > bugs for those--once again, if nobody knows about them, they can't get
>> > fixed.
>> >
>> > --B.R.
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
>> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>



-- 
 Cordially.

Deploy your softwares for all platforms and finally update them in 3 clicks.
Try now the OpenSource MonoOSC tool
http://monoosc.sourceforge.net/
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid/
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu/
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu:/Mono/

windows take you more($), Linux give you more!!
Political Power cannot be wisdom!

 Small Eric Quotations of the days:
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious