[Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
chornsokun at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 01:22:42 EST 2010
Totally agree with @daniel except that I am not agree the part where said we
not thanks/appreciate Ubuntu team.
I don't know about the rest of the world but for me and the people that I
introduce to /talk with them about Ubuntu they all appreciate the great
afford and policing put into get this excellent distro for us.
Perhap using Window & develop in .NET Framework with just click and get
thing work make me junior coder a lazy labor. However to abandon Windows
camp and join Linux my option is to pick popular Linux distro and can do my
job on it that how I feel having mono ready and up to date on the Ubuntu
(official support :D) would be a big plus.
Build one run every where !
+855 12 222718
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:58 PM, daniel <trampster at gmail.com> wrote:
> The ubuntu devs package and deploy for their release which happens every
> 6 months. it is insane to say its up to them to package version released
> between OS versions.
> Ubuntu comes with a packaged version on gnome do, which is fine, however
> I choose to use a more recent version of gnome do so I use a PPA which
> is supplied by the developers (not the ubuntu devs)
> The fact that ubuntu/devian developers package mono for you for its OS
> releases is a bonus, did Microsoft package up mono and include it in
> its Windows 7? NO! did Apple package up mono and include it in snow
> leopard? no. So ubuntu is helping you guys out hugely but do you thank
> them? no, you just expect more of them.
> I also use Chrome in ubuntu. Its not in the repros at all, when I wanted
> to install chrome did google say... O sorry its up to ubuntu/debian to
> package chrome for you, its not our fault if they don't. No, they
> packaged it themselves and even provided different channels so I can
> decide exactly how cutting edge I want to be.
> So you have to worry about a newer version breaking existing
> applications, how is this different from on any other operating system?
> It's not up to the ubuntu devs to package new versions of mono for exist
> OS releases, its up to the mono project to do this and provide it as a PPA.
> The question you need to ask is, how important is the largest desktop
> linux distribution to the mono project.
> At my work we started to port a .net application to mono, however it
> need to run on ubuntu (8.04) do you know what version of mono is in
> 8.04 its 1.2.6, everything for our app was supported in mono 2.4 but
> mono 1.2.6? not even close. So we abandoned our efforts, I'm sure their
> are lots of other people out there with similar stories. Those of us who
> use ubuntu feel a little bit like second class citizens.
> B.R. wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Bálint Kardos <kardosbalint at gmail.com
> > <mailto:kardosbalint at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> > Fact 1: the provider decides on the virtualized platforms, not me.
> > They have Fedora, Ubuntu or Debian systems ready.
> > Fact 2: I've used Debian and Fedora for a decade, so I'm more
> > familiar with Ubuntu as with SuSe.
> > Fact 3: I've started working on merging all my sites/servers back
> > to Windows 2008.
> > It is a sad story, but the lack of real features on mono (Web
> > Services still has bugs for years, the LINQ implementation is a
> > horror etc.) makes it more and more hard to use it as a real
> > Production (not a toy playground) platform.
> > üdvözlettel
> > with regards
> > Kardos Bálint
> > _______________________________________
> > http://skaelede.hu 10 (0xA) év a magyar weben
> > If there are web services bugs, file bugs--if nobody knows about them,
> > they can't get fixed. Also, clarify what you mean by LINQ? LINQ to
> > Objects is pretty simple and there's only so many ways to implement
> > that, so I'm not sure how you can lay claim to that being a horror.
> > LINQ to SQL is a different story, and a huge effort that is only now
> > beginning to be integrated into Mono properly. You could also file
> > bugs for those--once again, if nobody knows about them, they can't get
> > fixed.
> > --B.R.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mono-list