[Mono-list] Re: Suggestions

Paulo Aboim Pinto esqueleto@tusofona.com
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:36:56 +0100


Hello

On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 16:35 -0600, Zac Bowling wrote:
> (...) restart of apache isn't not
> going to hurt unless someone is in mid stream of a massive download
> (which rarely happens with my stuff). 

For my case I have this kind of problem. I cannot restart Apache every
time, because someone can be doing download or viewing stream video or
audio.

Like someone said in this thread, this feature is more useful for
Production Environment. I don't imagine one hosting enterprise doing
restart of the Apache every time a user change is WebSite.

I will wait for the end of the year for new changes.


(())
Paulo Aboim Pinto
Odivelas - Portugal

> 
> Rarely do I run into an issue. Granted its all config files, but I
> prefer them (in fact on IIS 5 I would use a metabase editor and on II6 I
> would edit the new XML metabase directly instead of using the gui 95% of
> the time). Structure and automation is possible with flat config files
> (part of the reason why Microsoft can't get into the virtual hosting
> market since its so hard to automate it). I can quickly scan over my
> sites and see if anyone of them is different and fix it. If for someone
> reason I'm allowing WebDav on one and not on another I can put custom
> comments in. It would take me a day or two to do what I need to do in
> IIS what I can do under mod_mono in an hour. Granted its not the best
> solution for a person wanting to put a site and go and make little
> changes here and there when they want too, but after the learning curve
> the benefit is clear.
> 
> I love the the asp.net state management provided under mono as well.
> Similar to Microsoft's method but not clouded in strange things, its
> really simple to understand to so you can find out what is going on when
> a server isn't responding to your session keys correctly.
> 
> Its all manageable from this aspect :-) 
> 
> Hope that helps. 
>  
> 
>