[Mono-dev] Re moting between dotnet framework and mono framework

[Eric45]

Thanks for your support


Alan McGovern-2 wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just want to know if my serialiazed objects will come through client MS
>> dotnet and server MONO without problem.
> 
> 
> The first response by Robert said:
> 
> They are supported.
>>
> 
> and
> 
> You can expect 100% compatibility with custom classes (those you've
>> designed yourself).
> 
> 
> So yes, you can expect it to work.
> 
> Alan
> 
> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Jerome Haltom wrote:
>> >
>> > These questions are all answered on MSDN in the documentation
>> describing
>> > how works. Look into MarshalByRefObjects, ObjRef, transparent proxies
>> > and real proxies.
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 08:36 -0700, Eric45 wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps i was not enough precise in my question.
>> >>
>> >> I want to make a DOTnet client on windows running above Microsoft
>> DOTnet
>> >> framework 2.0.
>> >> Then i have a DOTnet server on linux running above MONO.
>> >>
>> >> So i am asking myself if remoting will be compliant.
>> >> Lets take an example.
>> >>
>> >> If the client pass a serialized object (one of my ISerializable class)
>> >> lets
>> >> named it Class1.
>> >> How the MONO server make the link with its own class Class1 (exactly
>> the
>> >> same) to reconstruct it ?
>> >> How it makes the link between Class1 on Windows DOTnet and the Class1
>> on
>> >> MONO ? Because the class has same name in same dll name and same
>> >> namespace ?
>> >> That i do not understand.
>> >>
>> >> For reference, MarshalledByRef, i think all is ok because it is only a
>> >> pointer on a proxy and an Interface. So i imagine it works.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Robert Jordan wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Eric45 wrote:
>> >> >> Is it possible to have a remoting MONO server working on linux
>> being
>> >> >> contacted by a DONET windows remoting client ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes.
>> >> >
>> >> >> If yes how the compliance is made between objects passed by
>> reference
>> >> ?
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't understand this question. Do you mean MarshalByRefObjects?
>> >> > They are supported.
>> >> >
>> >> >> Same question about objects passed by serialization ?
>> >> >
>> >> > You can expect 100% compatibility with custom classes (those you've
>> >> > designed yourself).
>> >> >
>> >> > Basic BCL classes (ArrayList, Hashtable) are also compatible,
>> >> > but it's safer to not depend on classes that are not under your
>> >> > control.
>> >> >
>> >> > Robert
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> >> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> >> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Remoting-between-dotnet-framework-and-mono-framework-tp22451273p22458037.html
>> Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Remoting-between-dotnet-framework-and-mono-framework-tp22451273p22458925.html
Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.