[Mono-dev] Re moting between dotnet framework and mono framework

[Alan McGovern]

Hi,

I just want to know if my serialiazed objects will come through client MS
> dotnet and server MONO without problem.


The first response by Robert said:

They are supported.
>

and

You can expect 100% compatibility with custom classes (those you've
> designed yourself).


So yes, you can expect it to work.

Alan

Thanks
>
>
>
> Jerome Haltom wrote:
> >
> > These questions are all answered on MSDN in the documentation describing
> > how works. Look into MarshalByRefObjects, ObjRef, transparent proxies
> > and real proxies.
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 08:36 -0700, Eric45 wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Perhaps i was not enough precise in my question.
> >>
> >> I want to make a DOTnet client on windows running above Microsoft DOTnet
> >> framework 2.0.
> >> Then i have a DOTnet server on linux running above MONO.
> >>
> >> So i am asking myself if remoting will be compliant.
> >> Lets take an example.
> >>
> >> If the client pass a serialized object (one of my ISerializable class)
> >> lets
> >> named it Class1.
> >> How the MONO server make the link with its own class Class1 (exactly the
> >> same) to reconstruct it ?
> >> How it makes the link between Class1 on Windows DOTnet and the Class1 on
> >> MONO ? Because the class has same name in same dll name and same
> >> namespace ?
> >> That i do not understand.
> >>
> >> For reference, MarshalledByRef, i think all is ok because it is only a
> >> pointer on a proxy and an Interface. So i imagine it works.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Robert Jordan wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Eric45 wrote:
> >> >> Is it possible to have a remoting MONO server working on linux being
> >> >> contacted by a DONET windows remoting client ?
> >> >
> >> > Yes.
> >> >
> >> >> If yes how the compliance is made between objects passed by reference
> >> ?
> >> >
> >> > I don't understand this question. Do you mean MarshalByRefObjects?
> >> > They are supported.
> >> >
> >> >> Same question about objects passed by serialization ?
> >> >
> >> > You can expect 100% compatibility with custom classes (those you've
> >> > designed yourself).
> >> >
> >> > Basic BCL classes (ArrayList, Hashtable) are also compatible,
> >> > but it's safer to not depend on classes that are not under your
> >> > control.
> >> >
> >> > Robert
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> >> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> >> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Remoting-between-dotnet-framework-and-mono-framework-tp22451273p22458037.html
> Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20090311/e91c115d/attachment-0001.html