[Mono-dev] Re moting between dotnet framework and mono framework

[Oliver Schneider]

Apart from .Net vs. Mono inter op (which is fine) the architecture of the
embedded box can be a problem, if it is not a x86 or ARM box. From my
experience the MIPSEL port can only be seen as unstable or even broken.

Oliver


Eric45 wrote:
> 
> 
> Thanks for your support
> 
> 
> Alan McGovern-2 wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I just want to know if my serialiazed objects will come through client MS
>>> dotnet and server MONO without problem.
>> 
>> 
>> The first response by Robert said:
>> 
>> They are supported.
>>>
>> 
>> and
>> 
>> You can expect 100% compatibility with custom classes (those you've
>>> designed yourself).
>> 
>> 
>> So yes, you can expect it to work.
>> 
>> Alan
>> 
>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jerome Haltom wrote:
>>> >
>>> > These questions are all answered on MSDN in the documentation
>>> describing
>>> > how works. Look into MarshalByRefObjects, ObjRef, transparent proxies
>>> > and real proxies.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 08:36 -0700, Eric45 wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi
>>> >>
>>> >> Perhaps i was not enough precise in my question.
>>> >>
>>> >> I want to make a DOTnet client on windows running above Microsoft
>>> DOTnet
>>> >> framework 2.0.
>>> >> Then i have a DOTnet server on linux running above MONO.
>>> >>
>>> >> So i am asking myself if remoting will be compliant.
>>> >> Lets take an example.
>>> >>
>>> >> If the client pass a serialized object (one of my ISerializable
>>> class)
>>> >> lets
>>> >> named it Class1.
>>> >> How the MONO server make the link with its own class Class1 (exactly
>>> the
>>> >> same) to reconstruct it ?
>>> >> How it makes the link between Class1 on Windows DOTnet and the Class1
>>> on
>>> >> MONO ? Because the class has same name in same dll name and same
>>> >> namespace ?
>>> >> That i do not understand.
>>> >>
>>> >> For reference, MarshalledByRef, i think all is ok because it is only
>>> a
>>> >> pointer on a proxy and an Interface. So i imagine it works.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Robert Jordan wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hi,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Eric45 wrote:
>>> >> >> Is it possible to have a remoting MONO server working on linux
>>> being
>>> >> >> contacted by a DONET windows remoting client ?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Yes.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> If yes how the compliance is made between objects passed by
>>> reference
>>> >> ?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I don't understand this question. Do you mean MarshalByRefObjects?
>>> >> > They are supported.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Same question about objects passed by serialization ?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > You can expect 100% compatibility with custom classes (those you've
>>> >> > designed yourself).
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Basic BCL classes (ArrayList, Hashtable) are also compatible,
>>> >> > but it's safer to not depend on classes that are not under your
>>> >> > control.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Robert
>>> >> >
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
>>> >> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>>> >> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
>>> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>>> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Remoting-between-dotnet-framework-and-mono-framework-tp22451273p22458037.html
>>> Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Remoting-between-dotnet-framework-and-mono-framework-tp22451273p22458925.html
> Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Re-moting-between-dotnet-framework-and-mono-framework-tp2461699p2462377.html
Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.