[Mono-dev] Deprecating some Mono commands, Cecil mono-api-info
Jonathan Pobst
monkey at jpobst.com
Mon Mar 3 12:34:24 EST 2008
Right, it is more condensed because it is missing the rest of the
information. :)
For your example, it is missing the attributes on the parameters. Both
files should be exactly the same.
Jonathan
Alan McGovern wrote:
> Well, if you look at the output you'll see that the cecil one is
> considerably more condensed and readable than the SRE one, so that could
> easily explain the filesize difference. For example, the 'ClearProps(in
> System.Byte&, in System.UInt32, in System.Guid&, in System.Int32)'
> method is 7 lines in the cecil version but about 24 lines in the SRE
> version.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Jonathan Pobst <monkey at jpobst.com
> <mailto:monkey at jpobst.com>> wrote:
>
> > Additionally, I believe that the Cecil-based mono-api-info is a
> > better implementation than the SRE-based implementation. And am
> > wondering if we should just replace our current implementation
> with the
> > version living in cecil (this would also eliminate mono-api-info and
> > mono-api-info2).
>
> I just tried running both versions on 2.0's Accessibility.dll. The SRE
> one is 122k, the Cecil one is 55k. So I don't think the Cecil one is
> ready yet for primetime.
>
> SRE: http://jpobst.com/Accessibility.xml
> Cecil: http://jpobst.com/Accessibility.Cecil.xml
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>
More information about the Mono-devel-list
mailing list