[Mono-dev] Deprecating some Mono commands, Cecil mono-api-info

Alan McGovern alan.mcgovern at gmail.com
Mon Mar 3 12:13:24 EST 2008

Well, if you look at the output you'll see that the cecil one is
considerably more condensed and readable than the SRE one, so that could
easily explain the filesize difference.  For example, the 'ClearProps(in
System.Byte&, in System.UInt32, in System.Guid&, in System.Int32)' method
is  7 lines in the cecil version but  about 24 lines in the SRE version.


On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Jonathan Pobst <monkey at jpobst.com> wrote:

> >     Additionally, I believe that the Cecil-based mono-api-info is a
> > better implementation than the SRE-based implementation.   And am
> > wondering if we should just replace our current implementation with the
> > version living in cecil (this would also eliminate mono-api-info and
> > mono-api-info2).
> I just tried running both versions on 2.0's Accessibility.dll.  The SRE
> one is 122k, the Cecil one is 55k.  So I don't think the Cecil one is
> ready yet for primetime.
> SRE: http://jpobst.com/Accessibility.xml
> Cecil: http://jpobst.com/Accessibility.Cecil.xml
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20080303/8c6d366f/attachment.html 

More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list