[MonoDevelop] CodeBehindService, ICodeBehindProvider - no support for partial classes?

[Ivan N. Zlatev]

To me it seems that the current CodeBehindService implementation is
based on class names and assumes that the code behind file will have a
different class name than the code-in-front file. What about partial
classes where the class name will be the same (and the difference will
be made by filename I suppose)?

What impact would this have if I want in my WinFormsAddin to have a
partial class, e.g Form1.cs and Form1.Designer.cs and I want
Form1.Designer.cs to be the codebehind file and be shown in the
project treeview as a child of Form1.cs?

Regards,
-- 
Ivan N. Zlatev

Web: http://www.i-nZ.net
"It's all some kind of whacked out conspiracy."