[MonoDevelop] Package content

Arnoux Vincent vincent.arnoux@rfo.atmel.com
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:10:15 +0200

OK, good enough for me.
However, perhaps it would be a good idea to also propose a 1-for-all=20
It may ease the install process a little bit for Linux newbies and for=20
people who just want mono to work out of the box.


Le 08/05/2004 09:56 AM, Simon Males a =E9crit :

>> I have a (probably dumb) question: why are there about 40 RPM's to=20
>> install for Red Hat in order to have a complete Mono installation,=20
>> when the is only one setup file for Windows ?
>> Shouldn't it be better to have only 1 package for Linux as for Windows=
> Because Linux (unix) design philosophy is to have one bit software for=20
> one task. Not one huge sticky taped package to do everything. Unix is=20
> classic developers platform, all depencies are like this.
> Just one of the differences for developing for Unix.