[Mono-list] Why Mono developers merged System.ServiceModel.Activation.dll to System.ServiceModel.dll?

[mauzik]

Hi,

I have ported .NET application to Mono. One of our subprojects use under
.NET  System.ServiceModel.Activation.dll assembly, but Mono has implement
functionality in different assembly (System.ServiceModel.dll). No problem I
added reference for System.ServiceModel.dll and application runs.
Complications occurs in third party libraries which use
System.ServiceModel.Activation.dll. I edited it and changed code for Mono
support. My question is why? Why Mono team decided for merge assembly? In my
opinion this is road to hell. Maybe there are serious reasons for this
decision. 

Thank for your response,
have a nice day.  



--
View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/Why-Mono-developers-merged-System-ServiceModel-Activation-dll-to-System-ServiceModel-dll-tp4660819.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.