[Mono-list] web server

[Doug]

+1 for this; I've had nothing but trouble running MVC apps using mono.

The web forms stuff is pretty mature, but setting the server up to run MVC
successfully is poorly documented and finiky.

... that said, there's just no comparison. The MVC stuff is lightyears
ahead of the classic ASP, and an excellent framework, but we're still
running our site on IIS; after trying for weeks to get a production stable
version running using mono we just gave up.

~
Doug.


On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Daniel Lo Nigro <lists at dan.cx> wrote:

> Mono 2.10 is somewhat compatible with ASP.NET MVC, but I've found Mono
> 2.11 and Mono 3.0.x to be more reliable than 2.10. I encountered some
> issues with Mono 2.10 that have since been fixed. Even though Mono 3 is a
> beta, I'd recommend trying it out :)
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:23 AM, edward.harvey.mono <
> edward.harvey.mono at clevertrove.com> wrote:
>
>> > From: daniel at d15.biz [mailto:daniel at d15.biz] On Behalf Of Daniel Lo
>> Nigro
>>
>> Awesome, this is the answer I was looking for:
>>
>> Mono 2.10.8 (current stable release) is compatible (green color on
>> http://mono-project.com/Compatibility ) with ASP.Net MVC 1, 2, and 3.
>>  If you're planning to run it on Linux, you'll probably use Apache and
>> mod_mono or Mono FastCGI.
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-list/attachments/20121214/cbf6d867/attachment.html>