[Mono-list] mono 2.4.1 release?
makska at yandex.ru
Wed May 27 19:47:39 EDT 2009
So, we should use mono-2-4 branch instead of mono-2-4-0? And we should
forget about branch mono-2-4-1?
Just check that I understand all in correct way :)
Thanks for help!
> My bad, use mono-2-4, that is where the fixes are, and what we will be
> branching from. So confusing!
> Jonathan Pobst wrote:
>> mono-2-4-0 is more complete and recent than mono-2-4-1, so use all of
>> 2.4.1 was made for a specific project, and has not been updated
>> since. All fixes intended to be part of 2.4.2 are on the 2.4.0
>> branch, but may not be on the 2.4.1 branch. Pretend 2.4.1 doesn't
>> exist. :)
>> We will be branching 2.4.2 from 2.4.0.
>> Maxim wrote:
>>> Hi Stephen!
>>> Thanks you for answer and suggestion. We use CentOS on our
>>> servers. Thats why we build mono from sources.
>>> I've found two branches in svn: mono-2-4-0 and mono-2-4-1.
>>> 2-4-1 have no some important parts: libgdiplus and mod_mono.
>>> Should we use these parts from mono-2-4-0 ?
>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
More information about the Mono-list