[Mono-list] mono 2.4.1 release?

[Maxim]

Hi Jonathan!

So, we should use mono-2-4 branch instead of mono-2-4-0? And we should
forget about branch mono-2-4-1?
Just check that I understand all in correct way :)

Thanks for help!

Maxim Karavaev

> My bad, use mono-2-4, that is where the fixes are, and what we will be
> branching from.  So confusing!
>
> Jonathan
>
> Jonathan Pobst wrote:
>> mono-2-4-0 is more complete and recent than mono-2-4-1, so use all of
>> mono-2-4-0.
>>
>> 2.4.1 was made for a specific project, and has not been updated
>> since. All fixes intended to be part of 2.4.2 are on the 2.4.0
>> branch, but may not be on the 2.4.1 branch.  Pretend 2.4.1 doesn't
>> exist.  :)
>>
>> We will be branching 2.4.2 from 2.4.0.
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> Maxim wrote:
>>> Hi Stephen!
>>>
>>> Thanks you for answer and suggestion. We use  CentOS  on our
>>> productions
>>> servers. Thats why we build mono from sources.
>>> I've found two branches in svn: mono-2-4-0 and mono-2-4-1.
>>> 2-4-1 have no some important parts: libgdiplus and mod_mono.
>>> Should we use these parts from mono-2-4-0 ?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>
>>
>
>