[Mono-list] mono 2.4.1 release?

[Jonathan Pobst]

My bad, use mono-2-4, that is where the fixes are, and what we will be 
branching from.  So confusing!

Jonathan

Jonathan Pobst wrote:
> mono-2-4-0 is more complete and recent than mono-2-4-1, so use all of 
> mono-2-4-0.
> 
> 2.4.1 was made for a specific project, and has not been updated since. 
> All fixes intended to be part of 2.4.2 are on the 2.4.0 branch, but may 
> not be on the 2.4.1 branch.  Pretend 2.4.1 doesn't exist.  :)
> 
> We will be branching 2.4.2 from 2.4.0.
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> Maxim wrote:
>> Hi Stephen!
>>
>> Thanks you for answer and suggestion. We use  CentOS  on our productions
>> servers. Thats why we build mono from sources.
>> I've found two branches in svn: mono-2-4-0 and mono-2-4-1.
>> 2-4-1 have no some important parts: libgdiplus and mod_mono.
>> Should we use these parts from mono-2-4-0 ?
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> 
>