[Mono-list] SPAM-LOW: Re: NUnit Version - Upgrade soon?

[Charlie Poole]

Follow up question on application installs:

The whole autotools thing seems like a bit of overkill for 
a pure .NET application. Is it reasonable to just use a
simple install target that copies everything under $(prefix)?

Any good examples to look at?

Charlie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mono-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com 
> [mailto:mono-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Charlie Poole
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:33 PM
> To: andreas.faerber at web.de
> Cc: 'List Mono'
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] SPAM-LOW: Re: NUnit Version - Upgrade soon?
> 
> Hi Andreas, 
> 
> Thanks, that's good info. It's more or less easy to read docs 
> and figure out technical stuff, but knowing just what will 
> meet folk's expectations is harder.
> 
> Charlie
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: andreas.faerber at web.de [mailto:andreas.faerber at web.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:05 AM
> > To: Charlie Poole
> > Cc: List Mono
> > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] SPAM-LOW: Re: NUnit Version - Upgrade soon?
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Am 02.12.2008 um 04:53 schrieb Charlie Poole:
> > 
> > > What do you think about "pure" makefile-based setups versus
> > > makefile+NAnt? It seems like the latter would be a plus for
> > > building on Windows as well as Linux.
> > 
> > NAnt would be another build dependency, so consider it a minus for 
> > other Unices.
> > I remember having issues building 0.85 on OSX (0.86 beta 
> worked better 
> > though).
> > 
> > Andreas
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com 
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>