[Mono-list] "Empty catch" rule proposal for Gendarme?

[Matthijs ter Woord]

How about also checking for throw ex; ? as this will loose stack information.



Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> It looks like a great candidate for a rule :-)
> 
> Sebastien
> 
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 18:47 +0200, "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]"
> wrote:
>> Hello. I'm just a little upset of the many times I have to spend debug 
>> sessions because of empty catch blocks (swallowing any exception that 
>> the programmer never could imagine...). Then I was just wondering if it 
>> was worth to create a rule for Gendarme that warned about it:
>>
>> catch
>> {
>> }
>>
>> OR:
>>
>> catch(Exception)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> OR:
>>
>> catch(Exception ex)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> 	Andrés	[ knocte ]
>>