[Mono-list] "Empty catch" rule proposal for Gendarme?

[Sebastien Pouliot]

Hey,

It looks like a great candidate for a rule :-)

Sebastien

On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 18:47 +0200, "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]"
wrote:
> Hello. I'm just a little upset of the many times I have to spend debug 
> sessions because of empty catch blocks (swallowing any exception that 
> the programmer never could imagine...). Then I was just wondering if it 
> was worth to create a rule for Gendarme that warned about it:
> 
> catch
> {
> }
> 
> OR:
> 
> catch(Exception)
> {
> }
> 
> OR:
> 
> catch(Exception ex)
> {
> }
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	Andrés	[ knocte ]
> 
-- 
Sebastien Pouliot  <sebastien at ximian.com>
Blog: http://pages.infinit.net/ctech/