[Mono-list] ASP.NET and Licensing

"Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
Fri Jul 28 02:35:47 EDT 2006

einKI.ml escribió:
>> If you don't want to use ASP.NET and/or System.Windows.Form it's up to you 
>> but note that the fact that there is a closed source implementation of them 
>> (i.e. Microsoft .NET Framewrok) doesn't mean that you should avoid their 
>> open source implementations (i.e. Mono or Portable.NET, IMHO Mono is much 
>> better:).
> Im just wondering because they are listed as "controversial elements" in
> the FAQ. But since I am somewhat familiar with ASP.NET I think it make
> sense to use it on Linux too.

There are other frameworks that you can use without ASP.NET AFAIK, that 
Miguel has not mentioned (perhaps the ones he has mentioned are too tied 
to the AJAX-thing, I mean, they require JavaScript):

- Maverick.NET (if you use non-ASP.NET methods for the view, such as 
XSLT+XML+XHTML or NVelocity)
[ http://mavnet.sourceforge.net/ ]

- CastleProject (the Ruby on Rails port to C#)
[ http://www.castleproject.org/ ]

- Spring.NET (I haven't used this one but seems a port of the Spring 
framework from Java to C# that uses AOP)
[ http://www.springframework.net/ ]

Using these frameworks you are not only avoiding the use of ASP.NET but 
besides you use a smarter way of developing web applications (MVC pattern).


	Andrés	[ knocte ]


More information about the Mono-list mailing list