[Mono-list] ".NET 3.0" misnomer

[Miguel de Icaza]

Hello,
 
> Now the problem is this: if nearly all of .NET 2.0 is portable, and none of
> NET 3.0 is portable, and .NET 3.5 will have crucial changes like LinQ,
> there's no guarantee that .NET 3.5 onward won't depend on .NET 3.0,
> therefore making .NET unportable. 

I have not seen anything in .NET 3.0 which is inherently difficult to
implement on Unix.  

If you could point out something that you think is fundamentally
unimplementable, we could have a discussion about that feature.

Miguel