[Mono-list] i18n

[Carlos Ble]

El mar, 08-11-2005 a las 19:20 -0600, Mario Carrión escribió:
> On 11/8/05, Carlos Ble <carlosble at shidix.com> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I am working in i18n with Mono.Posix. I have got build the project with
> > autotools + i18n looking the f-spot files and this article:
> Mono.Posix is deprecated.
> 

I use Catalog from Mono.Unix (using Mono.unix) but compile with
-r:Mono.Posix. 

> http://www.thehouseofblogs.com/PLANETAA/20058/Mono_i18n_Globalization_usando_Mono_Posix.php
> > and I think that the http://mono-project.com/Internationalization is
> > incomplete or wrong because I tried with that example and doesnt work.
> > It only works with .mo but no with .dll or maybe there is an unknown
> > step.
> > Thanks
> No, the example is fine and works. If you see the first section you'll
> see how to translated non-glade applications.
> 
> > ps - The documentation about autotools + i18n + mono doesnt exist and I
> > think that even in some mono projects people doesnt understand
> > directives from configure.in or Makefile.am, some people copies and
> > pastes.
> > Is a big handicap and a big work to investigate because my only tool is
> > proof and error. I promise to write some documentation about this when
> > we free the project. At the moment I recomend to read autobook despite
> > is oriented to  C/C++ projects, and use automake1.8 instead of
> > automake1.4 (default in my debian sid).
> Yes, you are right, automake 1.4 is old and under automake 1.9 works
> all the information written in the GNU Autootols tutorial, but that
> version (1.4) still works and some projects are still using the macros
> used in that version, that's why you might missunderstood some
> configure.in/am

Yes I might missunderstood lot ofs directives because iam a newbie with
autotools + i18n. The problem is that there are no documentation, is
difficult 
to learn about it.


> However, send a test case and the commands you use step-by-step for
> testing the article.
> 

I dont remeber exactly all steps I have done because were lots and some
of their was wrong. But I'll send it when found.
Thanks