[Mono-list] Why ByteFx needs Windows.Forms

George Birbilis George Birbilis" <birbilis@kagi.com
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:04:57 +0200

haven't read much on what ByteFX is, but couldn't it be split into more 
assemblies with the designers in a separate one?
I suppose if source is available one can try doing it themselves then 
contribute back the info on how to split it

George Birbilis (birbilis@kagi.com)
Microsoft Most Valuable Professional
MVP J# for 2004 & 2005

>I do not like the ideal of the driver requiring SWF either.  However, 
>ByteFX.Data uses S.W.F. for design-time support in Visual Studio.net such 
>as screating data sets based on some wizards...  I'm not sure all you can 
>do with this design-time support because I never use it.
> Barbara Plank wrote:
>>while installing byteFx I noticed (in several versions) that it
>>needs two packages:
>>Can anybody perhaps tell me WHY? I am wondering... and I don't have fully
>>understood why those packages..