[Mono-list] Why ByteFx needs Windows.Forms
George Birbilis" <email@example.com
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:04:57 +0200
haven't read much on what ByteFX is, but couldn't it be split into more
assemblies with the designers in a separate one?
I suppose if source is available one can try doing it themselves then
contribute back the info on how to split it
George Birbilis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Microsoft Most Valuable Professional
MVP J# for 2004 & 2005
>I do not like the ideal of the driver requiring SWF either. However,
>ByteFX.Data uses S.W.F. for design-time support in Visual Studio.net such
>as screating data sets based on some wizards... I'm not sure all you can
>do with this design-time support because I never use it.
> Barbara Plank wrote:
>>while installing byteFx I noticed (in several versions) that it
>>needs two packages:
>>Can anybody perhaps tell me WHY? I am wondering... and I don't have fully
>>understood why those packages..