[Mono-list] 3 TODOs in Threading namespace almost completed

[Jeroen Frijters]

Hi,

> > Why do assume a particular implementation? Marking a class=20
> sealed and
> > abstract seems like a perfectly sensible way to compile=20
> "static class".
>=20
> I think they might have felt that `static' conveys better the=20
> intention. =20

I'm sorry, I wasn't clear. What I meant was: The way to compile "static
class" would be to emit a class that is both abstract and sealed (and
not have a private constructor, like you said).

Regards,
Jeroen