[good] Re: [Mono-list] Is ASP.NET safe?
ted leslie
tleslie@tcn.net
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:56:29 -0400
My thinking and choice to use Mono is just the opposite of (below), I
use it for web servers
(not deployed), running on my own servers (hosting customers web sites),
as if in years to come there is a licensing issue, it effects only a few
of my "web servers",
if i was making a app. that could have a wide commercial audience, then
i'd be a bit more worried,
so I believe Mono is a very safe choice for web services based on a
worst case licensing scenerio,
and if that issue ever came to pass, hopefully I could jump to a
different class stack for those services.
-tl
Melinda wrote:
>On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 08:23, Rodrigo B. de Oliveira wrote:
>
>
>>The question was not about how good the asp.net support on mono is right
>>now. The question, a valid one, was what's the recommended approach to
>>write web applications since asp.net is not covered by the ECMA spec, in
>>other words, what's the equivalent piece of technology in the mono
>>stack?
>>
>>I guess the answer is that right now we don't have one.
>>
>>
>That is what I mean. That is what keep me away from Mono. Mono is good
>to write desktop applications with GTK# but for web services.... :(
>
>
>
>>all the best,
>>Rodrigo
>>
>>Em Qui, 2004-06-10 ās 21:54, Cory Nelson escreveu:
>>
>>
>>>ASP.NET is mainly just a collection of classes.
>>>
>>>The hack they call PHP doesn't even compare to it haha. Mono's
>>>ASP.NET support is actually very good.
>>>
>>>On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:39:35 +0700, Melinda <melinda_sayang@hotpop.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Ok, in FAQ page of go-mono website, there are statements like this:
>>>>The controversial elements are the ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms
>>>>subsets. Those are convenient for people who need full compatibility
>>>>with the Windows platform, but are not required for the open source Mono
>>>>platform, nor integration with today's Mono's rich support of Linux.
>>>>
>>>>....
>>>>
>>>>Ok, it said ASP.NET is just for people who need full compatibility for
>>>>Winblows platform, but not required for the open source Mono.
>>>>
>>>>So what is the alternative for ASP.NET in open source platform? Maybe
>>>>PHP.NET? :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
>>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
>
>
>