[Mono-list] Is ASP.NET safe?

[Melinda]

On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 08:23, Rodrigo B. de Oliveira wrote:
> The question was not about how good the asp.net support on mono is right
> now. The question, a valid one, was what's the recommended approach to
> write web applications since asp.net is not covered by the ECMA spec, in
> other words, what's the equivalent piece of technology in the mono
> stack?
> 
> I guess the answer is that right now we don't have one.
That is what I mean. That is what keep me away from Mono. Mono is good
to write desktop applications with GTK# but for web services.... :(

> 
> all the best,
> Rodrigo
> 
> Em Qui, 2004-06-10 ās 21:54, Cory Nelson escreveu:
> > ASP.NET is mainly just a collection of classes.
> > 
> > The hack they call PHP doesn't even compare to it haha.  Mono's
> > ASP.NET support is actually very good.
> > 
> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:39:35 +0700, Melinda <melinda_sayang@hotpop.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Ok, in FAQ page of go-mono website, there are statements like this:
> > > The controversial elements are the ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms
> > > subsets. Those are convenient for people who need full compatibility
> > > with the Windows platform, but are not required for the open source Mono
> > > platform, nor integration with today's Mono's rich support of Linux.
> > > 
> > > ....
> > > 
> > > Ok, it said ASP.NET is just for people who need full compatibility for
> > > Winblows platform, but not required for the open source Mono.
> > > 
> > > So what is the alternative for ASP.NET in open source platform? Maybe
> > > PHP.NET? :)
> > > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list