[Mono-list] mcs and mono package

Fred Blaise chapeaurouge@MadPenguin.org
Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:45:10 -0500


wow... I open my mailbox... and....

http://fred.blaisern.com/gallery/actions/image_resized_view.php?prev_path=albums%2FOthers&filename=kiorky_flood.png&new_width=934&new_height=669

Quoting KiOrKY <kiorky@goddess-gate.com>:

> this is my way fir mono
> compile mono-cvs-snapshot and do make install
> compile mcs and do make install
>  and re do make install  in mono-cvs-snapshot
> for me, both are installed, and thats no problem ;)
> (checkinstall -D is very nice)
>
> if you have packages what about do this (install mono then mcs then re mono)
> (even with force option)
>
> regards
>
> Melinda <melinda_sayang@hotpop.com> a écrit :
>
> > On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 18:30, Giuseppe Greco wrote:
> > &gt; The split between mono and mcs is historical...
> > &gt; The mono package contains the execution environment
> > &gt; source code, plus the pre-compiled class library.
> > Is it safe to tell people that: mono-xxx.tar.bz2 has compiler for C#
> > inside? I am writing article about mono but I m still confuse. Do we
> > need mcs in order to install C# compiler for your computer? The link for
> > downloading mcs-xxx.tar.gz is:
> > Mono Class Libraries and C# Compiler 0.95
> >
> > You see.... C# compiler.... C# compiler.......
> > But with mono and without mcs, you have C# compiler already. YOu could
> > do something like this: mcs blabla.cs without installing mcs package. I
> > am confuse..... What is mcs? Where  is C# compiler truly? In mono or mcs
> > package?
> >
> > &gt; To get mono running, you just need this package.
> > &gt;
> > &gt; The mcs package contains the class library source
> > &gt; code, and you need it only if you want to compile
> > &gt; the class library by yourself.
> > Why would someone want to do this?
> >
> > Thank you, guyz.... I just hope I can clarify this in my article so my
> > readers are not confuse just like me.....
> > &gt;
> > &gt; j3d.
> > &gt;
> > &gt; , in reality the
> > &gt; .NET Framework has deeper dependencies than those that meet the eye.
> > &gt; They should be in fact be considered as one package.
> > &gt;
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
> --
> ----------------------------
>     I{ i () r |{ Y
>     Debian User
> ---------------------------------------------
> -- Mathieu PASQUET
> -- Testeur Debian SID
> -- irc: #debian-fr / irc.freenode.net port: 6667
> -- Site: www.fr.debian.org
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>