[Mono-list] RE: [Mono-devel-list] Surveys: Mono 1.0 andMonoConference.

[yoros@wanadoo.es]

On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 10:57:41AM -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > On the subject of a mono v1.0  - As a developer on both windows and linux
> > tring to make a business audiance understand that mono 1.0 is not
> > compatiable with .net 1.0 would be disastrous - don't do it . Mono has to be
> > feature and version number exact with MS if this is to work. Basically avoid
> > FUD
> 
> This is a good point, and one that has worried me for some time.
> 
> I think the solution to this particular problem is:
> 
> 	* Release with a name that specifically states whats in it
> 
> 		Mono Core 1.0
> 
> 	* Release a roadmap with the plans for when features will be
> 	  added to the full Mono release.
> 
> Maybe we need better names than `Mono Core' and `Mono Full'.
> 

I think that the best we can do without SWF is to release:

	"Mono Server Edition 1.0"

And be sure all corlib, ASP.NET, WebServiced, etc... are full featured.

Regards,

    Pedro

-- 
Pedro Martínez Juliá
\  yoros@terra.es
)|    yoros@wanadoo.es
/        http://yoros.dyndns.org
Socio HispaLinux #311
Usuario Linux #275438 - http://counter.li.org
GnuPG public information:  pub  1024D/74F1D3AC
Key fingerprint = 8431 7B47 D2B4 5A46 5F8E  534F 588B E285 74F1 D3AC