Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:28:19 -0000
I can update for JANET
Parser done done
Execution C# (done) C# (done)
node interpreter done done?
Basic runtime (runtime errors on mono) done?
Helper libs done done?
Vsa integration 0% done?
CodeDom integr. 0% done?
Test suite 0% done?
Steve/Jeron can you double check and correct me if I am wrong.
Note that other than the change to Reflection.Emit Janet is being ported
from C# generation to IL. Therefore all items above can be considered
from this respect as 0%.
From: Paolo Molaro [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: 09 January 2003 15:57
To: Simon Waite
Cc: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
On 01/09/03 Simon Waite wrote:
> That sounds good, I've no problem with LGPL, but I think the final
> rests with miguel(wrt mono) and ultimatly the previous owner (I'm
Steve Newman is not the 'previous owner' :-)
He's the author and has final say on his code (by changing the license
in the sources).
and the components may use different licenses, as long as they can be
linked together. Ultimately the author of the component decides the
license. Of course having a single license would result in less
questions on the list, I guess:-)
As I understand it, currently the status of the projects is basically
(I'm using 'done' as in pretty good shape):
Parser done done
Execution C# (working?) node interpreter (status?)
Basic runtime done done
Helper libs done? done?
Vsa integration none? done?
CodeDom integr. none? none?
Test suite none? ?
Both are missing Reflection.Emit support.
Please, whoever knows better the status, change the table and post an
Once it's known what is missing for the complete solution and what the
projects can reuse from each other the authors may have a better idea of
what component of the complete solution may need a license change.
firstname.lastname@example.org Monkeys do it better
Mono-list maillist - Monoemail@example.com