Sun, 5 Jan 2003 22:26:19 -0800
At 11:05 AM -0500 1/5/03, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>> * The current JANET license is GPL, is that ok? (since I think the class
>> libraries are distributed under the MIT license)
>I have CCed Steve on this email.
>Steve, would it be possible for you to relicense Janet under the X11
>license? The idea we have is to turn Janet into a dynamic compiler that
>could be used to implement the VSA and JScript interfaces exposed by
Yes, I have no objection to relicensing, multiple licenses, or whatever. Basically I have no agenda here, I'm just happy to see the code get used.
> > * is the current split in assemblies ok (PrettyPrinter.dll,
>> JPrimitive.dll, JObjects.dll, etc)? or should we have a single JANET
>Single assembly sounds nice to me; It seems like the current split was
>done to implement partial compilation.
Yes, and also because at the time I didn't fully understand how the C# compiler worked. The whole thing is small enough that a single assembly probably makes much more sense.
> > * do you have Steve's 'TODO' list?
>I do not.
I'm in the process of editing it down to a readable form. I'll try to get it posted by tommorrow.