Re: [Mono-list] DotGNU
Wed, 29 May 2002 12:53:29 +0500
This is the reply on Your message from Tuesday, May 28, 2002, 11:00:04 PM.
>> is there some difference between Portable.NET and Mono? Both provides
>> .NET support, ilasm, csc, ... it's ok?
GR> mono has a compiler written in c#
GR> Portable.net has it written in C.
GR> I also _think_ mono is more progressed, has expecially a better class lib,
GR> has a better name that does not remind me and the open source developers
GR> that hopefully use mono of Microsoft.net and does not invite Microsof to
GR> start trouble because of the .net in the name ;-)
But DotGNU is not only Portable.NET ;)
It seems to be more powerfull with all it's other subprojects.
Is (or will be?) there any integration proccess between Mono and DotGNU?
With best regards,