[Mono-list] DotGNU

Guenther Roith groith@tcrz.net
Tue, 28 May 2002 20:00:04 +0200

> is there some difference between Portable.NET and Mono? Both provides
> .NET support, ilasm, csc, ... it's ok?

mono has a compiler written in c#
Portable.net has it written in C.

I also _think_ mono is more progressed, has expecially a better class lib,
has a better name that does not remind me and the open source developers
that hopefully use mono of Microsoft.net and does not invite Microsof to
start trouble because of the .net in the name ;-)