mono and .NET Compact Framework (was: Re: [Mono-list] CLI and devices)

[Guenther Roith]

> In fact, the best and easiest solution for a stripped down version of mono
> would be compatible to the compact framework (easier to port from
> Compact.net to mono, a clear direction where development could go).
>
> I know, this is not a task for the next time, but if mono decides to take
> it, compact.net compatiblity would be a good thing.

I forgot to mention:



The compact Framework can't be very compact, as it has support for
Windows.Forms, ADO.NET, ASP.NET, and of course the low-level classes.


mor at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/device/compact.asp