[Mono-list] Fwd: Possible replacement for Windows.Forms
17 Jul 2002 01:07:44 -0500
This is obviously a problem too, but the other option is to create yet
another library to dynamically link to. Not to mention requiring a C++
compiler as well. I know Miguel tends to be concerned about such
things. Though I am not sure Ximian would officially support such a
thing... or even make use of it. I think that a major supporter would
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 00:23, murban wrote:
> What proportion of the code for the reimplemented WxWindows would be unique to
> each toolkit (e.g. MS Windows, GTK+, Xlib, Motif, Carbon)?
> My concern would be that instead of creating two libraries, one that maps C#
> to C another layer that maps C to C++, you're going to have a C# to C library
> for MS Windows, another for GTK+, another for Xlib, etc.
> On Tuesday 16 July 2002 11:12 pm, you wrote:
> > This is why I think reimplementing wxWindows would be better. It would
> > also not add additional requirements. It would compile against
> > something the user should have (GTK+, Xlib, Motif, Aqua, Carbon, etc.)
> > Of course, this runs into the problem of having to maintain the code
> > changes wxWindows has.
> Mono-list maillist - Monoemail@example.com