[Mono-list] Missing Types from corlib
Ravi Pratap M
05 Jan 2002 20:51:50 +0530
On Sat, 2002-01-05 at 09:59, John Barnette wrote:
> This *would* allow us to do good accurate coverage reports, though, by
> munging through the assembly. That's a lot easier than parsing text and
> trying to figure out what entity a comment is associated with.
Yes indeed, it makes sense.
Hmm, okay, we now have a contructor which accepts a comment string too
"If you're smart, you'll be humble. There always is somebody
who hasn't read a book and knows twice as much as you do."
-- David Duchovny in Readers' Digest
Ravi Pratap M <firstname.lastname@example.org>