[Mono-list] Missing Types from corlib
04 Jan 2002 21:29:57 -0700
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 21:02, Ravi Pratap M wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 22:46, Nick Drochak wrote:
> > I was thinking that MonoTODO would only be used for public methods as a
> > marker that the method is incomplete. And so, yes, I guess it would be
> > up to the developer to put the TODO like this:
> > [MonoTODO("finish that inner method first")]
> Well, most of the time, what needs to be done is found in some FIXME
> comment inside the code so do you really want to have a positional
> argument which is a string ?
This *would* allow us to do good accurate coverage reports, though, by
munging through the assembly. That's a lot easier than parsing text and
trying to figure out what entity a comment is associated with.