[Mono-list] Mono and ADO.NET

William Wise will@digitalelite.com
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:48:44 -0400


I'd love to do it but until we move to Linux on the desktop (slated for Q1
2004...we're moving backend servers first and our citrix boxes will move to
X as the last piece of the puzzle) I need to develop the app to work on
Windows and WinForms.  ]

What I can (and plan to) do is isolate the data access portions of the
application from the GUI so there's no reason I can't write some CLI test
code and keep you appraised of how well it runs under mono with postgresql.

Basically, it's our dependence on WinForms that makes full development under
mono undoable.

(Just FYI, for apps that need to remain on Windows until we've found
suitable replacements (mainly ERP stuff) we'll be using Citrix to share the
app to our X session clients)

Will

PS:  Great job on ADO.NET...it sounds like this part of the project is
maturing quickly.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rodrigo Moya [mailto:rodrigo@ximian.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 6:08 PM
To: William Wise
Cc: Mono List
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Mono and ADO.NET


On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 20:25, William Wise wrote:
> I'm developing an application utilizing ADO.NET and will want to (within
> approx. one year) eventually migrate the application to work with the Mono
> .NET implementation.
>
you could start right now using the ADO.NET support in mono, of course,
if you want to help filling the missing gaps while you develop your app
:-) Well, what I mean is that we're not that far to having full ADO.NET
support in Mono, and we've got a lot of working things, so if we could
get more help, we'd finish it really soon :-)

> In developing the data architecture for the application are there and
> objects I should stay away from in order to insure the smoothest possible
> transition (minimum code rewrite) to Mono's ADO.NET implementation?  (For
> example, strongly typed datasets versus untyped datasets, etc...)
>
we are implementing all the classes in Microsoft .NET's System.Data, so
you can be sure that things will work the same in Mono as with the MS's
implementation. We'll maybe provide extra classes to fix some things
we've found missing while developing ADO.NET in Mono, but if you keep
using the MS's System.Data classes, things will work out of the box with
no changes (or at least that's the plan :-)

> Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.  In particular I'm a
little
> reticient to use the dataadapter and dataset wizards to produce .xsd files
> as I'm not sure the utilities (XSD.EXE) necessary to generate strongly
typed
> datasets will be done within this timeframe.
>
They could be ready if we got more help for implenenting ADO.NET support
in Mono :-)

cheers
--
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@ximian.com>