[Mono-list] Bonobo/Corba and mono

[Sebastien Lambla]

rewriting the COM interop classes? Why not simply having *another* namespace
for BONOBO/Corba/Name-your-favorite-component-model-here and not implement
the Microsoft namespace where the COM interop classes seems to be ?

Sebastien Lambla

-----Message d'origine-----
De : mono-list-admin@ximian.com [mailto:mono-list-admin@ximian.com]De la
part de Martin Coxall
Envoyé : mercredi 11 juillet 2001 11:49
À : Miguel de Icaza; Jeffrey Stedfast
Cc : Pablo Baena; mono-list@ximian.com
Objet : Re: [Mono-list] Bonobo/Corba and mono


> > Mono isn't a component system, so it won't be replacing Bonobo.
>
> Well, I wish it will ;-)
>
> At least we will provide hooks when running on Unix to talk to Bonobo.

I guess we'll just rewrite the COM interop classes to be BONOBO interop?

For that matter, why not have DCOP interop as well? Put aside all that
KDE/GNOME bickering in the name of peace and harmony.

I am sure that Trolltech could also reimplement System.Windows.Forms
classes,
so that people can choose whether they have Mono use GTK+ or QT.

Oh, the harmony.

---
Martin
---

"Where laughing and smiling are not allowed"


_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list