[DotGNU]Re: [Mono-list] Mono/dotGNU Love-In Proposals
Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:31:03 +0100
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:28:06PM +0100, Martin Coxall wrote:
> Indeed. But to assume that *none* of them has a point is hubristic, surely.
> Look, all I am saying is that Mono so far has not done a good job of PR,
> relations with Portable.NET and dotGNU, and communication in general. Here we
> have an easy way to rectify all those issues in one fell swoop.
> Would we not be foolish not to take that route?
Can I make an even more revolutionary suggestion?
Let's get on with getting the code right first, and worrying about the
PR later. What's actually the important thing, here?
That Which Does Not Kill Me Postpones the Inevitable