[Mono-docs-list] Fwd: [Mono-winforms-list] Exception when using monodocer on System.Windows.Forms.dll

[Miguel de Icaza]

Hello,

> Please don't forget to adapt the makefile to assemble the generated 
> documentation. Right now this is not being done in a generic way, every 
> documented assembly is hard coded into the Makefile.am.

Am not sure I understand the problem.

> This may be right but not providing the stubs in monodoc makes it impossible 
> for users to contribute documentation. That way at least a few things can be 
> documented. In addition I have to say that I agree to Jonathan stubs can be 
> usefull to since they provide the name of the argument, from which you can at 
> least imagine how to use the method correctly.

There is something else that we need to keep in mind: it turns out that
argument names in the ECMA spec are relevant.  They are not purely for
decorative purposes.

This is a problem, because early on, we did not use the same arguments
as Microsoft did, so we will have to go back and fix that at some point.