[Mono-docs-list] Fwd: [Mono-winforms-list] Exception when using monodocer on System.Windows.Forms.dll

Miguel de Icaza miguel at ximian.com
Wed Dec 20 14:21:44 EST 2006


> Please don't forget to adapt the makefile to assemble the generated 
> documentation. Right now this is not being done in a generic way, every 
> documented assembly is hard coded into the Makefile.am.

Am not sure I understand the problem.

> This may be right but not providing the stubs in monodoc makes it impossible 
> for users to contribute documentation. That way at least a few things can be 
> documented. In addition I have to say that I agree to Jonathan stubs can be 
> usefull to since they provide the name of the argument, from which you can at 
> least imagine how to use the method correctly.

There is something else that we need to keep in mind: it turns out that
argument names in the ECMA spec are relevant.  They are not purely for
decorative purposes.

This is a problem, because early on, we did not use the same arguments
as Microsoft did, so we will have to go back and fix that at some point.

More information about the Mono-docs-list mailing list