[Mono-docs-list] Monkeyguide license?

[Hector E. Gomez Morales]

Then the only choice for the license for documentation is X11, so we
have to contact the other contributors (in the possible) of monkeyguide
to agree to use X11. And will be necessary to post a similar notice like
in monodoc that all contributions are licensed under X11 in my IMHO.

On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 13:37, John Luke wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 00:54 -0600, Hector E. Gomez Morales wrote:
> > Well I thought that monkeyguide was too in MIT X11 license like monodoc,
> > seeing this situation I think it will be better that all the
> > documentation is under one license be it X11 or GPL FDA. I have some
> > unfinished docs for monkeyguide so it will be good for me to know the
> > consensus on this.
> 
> I believe the reason for not wanting to use GFDL is that debian
> considers it non-free and won't ship packages with it.  It's rather
> silly for that large group of linux users to not have mono documentation
> available to them, so that is why X11 or something similar is a good
> idea.
> 
> P.S. I don't use debian so I am do not know why they consider it non-
> free
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-docs-list maillist  -  Mono-docs-list@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list