[Mono-docs-list] Monkeyguide license?

[John Luke]

On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 00:54 -0600, Hector E. Gomez Morales wrote:
> Well I thought that monkeyguide was too in MIT X11 license like monodoc,
> seeing this situation I think it will be better that all the
> documentation is under one license be it X11 or GPL FDA. I have some
> unfinished docs for monkeyguide so it will be good for me to know the
> consensus on this.

I believe the reason for not wanting to use GFDL is that debian
considers it non-free and won't ship packages with it.  It's rather
silly for that large group of linux users to not have mono documentation
available to them, so that is why X11 or something similar is a good
idea.

P.S. I don't use debian so I am do not know why they consider it non-
free