[Mono-dev] System.Json string handling
Andres G. Aragoneses
knocte at gmail.com
Sun Sep 21 13:06:08 UTC 2014
I guess it is creating pull requests that fix/add stuff, and reviewing
the pull requests of others, even if you don't have a final say for the
merge.
On 21/09/14 12:58, Chris Rogus wrote:
> So, lurker though I have been to date, I would like to one day be able
> to help. Miguel/whoever, what is the road to prove myself to be able to
> help with this backlog and support this excellent and worthwhile project?
>
> On Sep 21, 2014 5:18 AM, "Martin Thwaites" <monoforum at my2cents.co.uk
> <mailto:monoforum at my2cents.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> I would have to both agree and disagree with Edward on that...
>
> Yes you need things to be updated and made to work so you get people
> wanting to use the platform. However, without making sure that the
> patches meet standards and are considering all the options, you risk
> the opposite the code gets worse, there are knock on affects.
>
> I'm as frustrated with the current process as most as I've been
> waiting for the MVC5 stuff to be fixed and merged for a while. What
> I would say is though, I'd prefer for MVC4 to continue working as
> is, than some MVC5 stuff work and MVC4 become unstable.
>
> You have to appreciate the position Miguel and the mono team are
> in. They have a commercial product to maintain, that without that,
> they wouldn't be able to eat (or put on what I've been told are
> awesome parties).
>
> At the end of the day, having mono is better than not. Also, it's
> better maintained than some other open source projects.
>
> That said, I think that there isn't enough time, currently,
> dedicated to code that isn't useful to Xamarin. They have taken
> stewardship of a platform that goes beyond mobile platforms, and are
> controlling the elements that are not part of their core business,
> however, they are acting as a bottleneck for those.
>
> In short, there is a lot room for improvement, but where we are is
> by no means a bad position.
>
> Just my two (or possibly four) cents.
>
> Martin
>
> On 21 September 2014 02:29, 何子杰Hzj_jie <hzj_jie at hotmail.com
> <mailto:hzj_jie at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
> And how to define practices and skills? If you guys do not have
> time to review the changes from contributors out of mono group,
> then how to find out new people to join the group? And, I
> continually see an incorrect design pattern in mono source code,
> which may cause unexpected behavior in multithreading
> environment. This kind of issue may not be able to get totally
> fixed, until someone else pointed out the design pattern is not
> correct.
>
> .Hzj_jie
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Edward Ned Harvey (mono)
> <mailto:edward.harvey.mono at clevertrove.com>
> Sent: 21/9/2014 3:13
> To: Miguel de Icaza <mailto:miguel at xamarin.com>; 何子杰Hzj_jie
> <mailto:hzj_jie at hotmail.com>
> Cc: Steffen Kieß <mailto:Steffen.Kiess at ipvs.uni-stuttgart.de>;
> mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> <mailto:mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> Subject: RE: [Mono-dev] System.Json string handling
>
> > From:mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com
> <mailto:mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com>
> [mailto:mono-devel-list- <mailto:mono-devel-list->
> >bounces at lists.ximian.com <mailto:bounces at lists.ximian.com>] On
> Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey (mono)
> >
> > Tru dat. However,
>
> I guess I'm actually trying to say two separate things:
>
> * When broken stuff doesn't get fixed, it's a disincentive for
> usage adoption.
> and
> * When pull requests get ignored, it is a disincentive to
> contributors trying to contribute anymore (fixing things).
>
> This is an unfortunate positive feedback loop, which can
> hopefully be broken some day. I know based on my experience
> here so far, I'm not going to bother trying to fix anything
> anymore. My time would have been better spent, finding an
> alternative to mono SslStream instead of trying to contribute
> the fix to make mono SslStream operational.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
More information about the Mono-devel-list
mailing list