[Mono-dev] Olive Status
atsushieno at veritas-vos-liberabit.com
Mon Dec 13 22:30:29 EST 2010
Oh, ok. It is indeed outdated (it has been unchanged for 3 years).
We indeed have stubs for WF4 in olive module since it is smaller than
WF3 and easier, but right now the mono team has no plan to work on it.
So it is left as "contribution welcome" area.
IMO I don't think we should dare explicitly state that the wiki page is
outdated on that page itself (since there are indeed some code that used
to work and some people might want to continue hacking these old stuff).
It could be done after someone actually started WF4 hacking as an
(2010/12/14 12:07), Travis Smith wrote:
> http://mono-project.com/Workflow could use to be updated on the
> location of the mailing list then.
> What's the status of these sections? Are there portions that need love
> that I could look at digging into?
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Atsushi Eno
> <atsushieno at veritas-vos-liberabit.com> wrote:
>> The mono-olive mailing list was shut down to migrate to here (I posted about
>> that as the last message there), so you are welcome here in the right place
>> now to discuss WF or Messaging :)
>> Atsushi Eno
>> (2010/12/14 11:52), Travis Smith wrote:
>>> I figured contributing to an area I work with would be easier. I was
>>> looking at WF or System.Messaging and was interested in finding out
>>> the status of those 'areas' to see what love they need. Failing that,
>>> I'm open to other suggestions that need more immediate love.
>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Miguel de Icaza<miguel at novell.com>
>>>> Hello Travis,
>>>> Most of the libraries "graduate" into regular Mono, and with it, most
>>>> the discussions. This is the new home of the discussion.
>>>> Is there a particular area that you are interested in contributing
>>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Travis Smith<travis at legomaster.net>
>>>>> I was looking at possible ways to provide value for mono, saw Olive on
>>>>> the site (http://mono-project.com/Olive). I went over to the mailing
>>>>> list but it's just filled with spam. Anyone know what the status of
>>>>> that is? Is the page just out of date?
>>>>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>>>>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
More information about the Mono-devel-list