[Mono-dev] revert of r104029/30/31

[Atsushi Eno]

Well, at least I wouldn't ask for request for line ending changes
that would be just messy. One stop asking without patch would be
quicker. (When I am asked to review line ending changes, probably
I will feel messy ;-)

Atsushi Eno

Andreas Färber wrote:
> 
> Am 26.05.2008 um 11:23 schrieb Atsushi Eno:
> 
>> Changing parameter names may result in bugs (especially when
>> there is a field that has the identical name). When it is mixed
>> with line ending changes, it becomes very hard to identify the
>> cause of the issue. Those changes should be done separately.
> 
> I was told so too, but Andreas N. was recently flamed for doing a 
> separate typo fix commit.
> And review for such non-functional patches, while trivial and 
> non-breaking, appears to be handled with very low priority...
> 
> Andreas
> 
>