[Mono-dev] Sys.SM.Configuration changes caused too much regressions

Atsushi Eno atsushi at ximian.com
Mon Mar 24 13:33:09 EDT 2008

No matter how it works in your machine, the tests are indeed broken
as monobuild shows. See System.ServiceModel test results:

BTW you always have meaningless ChangeLog entry such as:

> Log:
> fix implementation, refactoring

but it is not true. For example for r98854 which you put *new file*
which is neither implementation fix nor refactoring at all.

Atsushi Eno

Igor Zelmanovich wrote:
> Hello Atsushi,
> There was some not implemented API in System.Configuration
> I've implemented it in r98680
> You have rebuild (and install) System.Configuration to have the tests
> pass.
> I have no such regressions in my Ubuntu.
> If you still have any such regression, please send me exception's stack
> trace.
> Be sure I run nunit test suite each time I have commit.
> Igor Zelmanovich.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Atsushi Eno [mailto:atsushi at ximian.com] 
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 1:50 PM
> To: Igor Zelmanovich
> Cc: mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com; mono-olive at googlegroups.com
> Subject: Sys.SM.Configuration changes caused too much regressions
> Hello Igor,
> I usually don't care too much about NUnit test regressions in the
> face of significant development in olive, but lately you broke too
> much tests due to System.ServiceModel.Configuration improvements.
> More than 10 tests now fails with NotImplementedException which
> is raised inside configuration stuff.
> Please remove any configuration hook from existing working stuff
> such as ChannelFactory. If you do not, I'll revert several things
> instead next week, which could mess your work. Thanks in advance.
> Atsushi Eno

More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list