No subject

developer, I agree that mono 1.0 should correspond to .net 1.0, 1.1 to =
1.1, etc for compatibility (and marketing) reasons.

Will a .90 Release just not cut it? And for that matter 1.09, etc?=20

Just a suggestion of course...

-----Original Message-----
From: ndrochak at gol.com [mailto:ndrochak at gol.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:40 AM
To: Rob.Tillie at Student.tUL.EDU; mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Version moniker for Mono Release

|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: Rob.Tillie at Student.tUL.EDU [mailto:Rob.Tillie at Student.tUL.EDU]
|  Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:40 PM
|  To: nick at ingeniumgroup.com; mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
|  Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Version moniker for Mono Release
|=20
|  Well, you've got a point, without a doubt.
|  But Miguel also has a point in that Mono should be releasing a stable
|  release very soon now... I believe Mono has a lot of momentum right =
now,
|  by
|  waiting too long, that momentum could decrease, having the same =
result by
|  losing a large user base...
|=20

I agree completely.  I didn't mean to imply delaying the release, only =
to
choose the name carefully.

Regards,
Nick D.

_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list