[Mono-dev] Mono version numbering

[buhochileno at gmail.com]

I agree.

Jerry van Leeuwen wrote:
>
> I think the only way to minimise confusion in the developer population 
> that does not keep up-to-date with the details of development on Mono 
> is to let at least the major version track full .NET compatibility. 
> That is, do not move to v2.x.x until at least .NET 2.0 can be fully 
> supported, do not move to v3.x.x until at least .NET 3.0 can be fully 
> supported and maybe even do not move to v3.5.x until .NET 3.5 is 
> supported.
>
> People that are aware of what is really going on under the hood will 
> be able to make more detailed judgement calls and will not really care 
> what version numbering you exactly use. It's the people that do not 
> glance further than the version number that need to be accomodated.
> ------------------------------------------
> This e-mail is confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, 
> any use, disclosure or copying of this document is unauthorised and 
> prohibited.  If you have received this document in error, please 
> delete the email and notify me by return email or by phoning the 
> NEMMCO Helpdesk on 1300 300 295.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>