[Mono-dev] We want to contribute

[Martin Hinks]

My 2 cents would be to get SWF to a good state and then port
MonoDevelop to that so that it can be cross platform rather than
wasting time porting it....

Martin

On 7/17/06, Ivan N. Zlatev <contact at i-nz.net> wrote:
> On 7/17/06, "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]" <knocte at gmail.com> wrote:
> > My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the
> > port of MonoDevelop to Windows. I think this goal would make Mono take
> > off on many fields (nowadays, it is very difficult to convince people
> > about using a multiplatform development tool whose own IDE is not
> > multiplatform).
>
> What is the use case of that? Do you think Windows users will use
> MonoDevelop instead of Visual Studio or SharpDevelop? It would be
> better if one can integrate Mono related tools in already existing
> Windows tools (take Prj2Make as an example).
>
> My personal opinion is that the group should pick up a namespace and
> implement missing 2.0 classes or do some 1.1 classlib work.
>
> --
> Ivan N. Zlatev
>
> Web: http://www.i-nZ.net
> GPG Key: http://files.i-nZ.net/i-nZ.asc
> "It's all some kind of whacked out conspiracy."
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>


-- 
Martin Hinks
http://www.m-s-d.net