[Mono-dev] We want to contribute

[Ivan N. Zlatev]

On 7/17/06, "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]" <knocte at gmail.com> wrote:
> My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the
> port of MonoDevelop to Windows. I think this goal would make Mono take
> off on many fields (nowadays, it is very difficult to convince people
> about using a multiplatform development tool whose own IDE is not
> multiplatform).

What is the use case of that? Do you think Windows users will use
MonoDevelop instead of Visual Studio or SharpDevelop? It would be
better if one can integrate Mono related tools in already existing
Windows tools (take Prj2Make as an example).

My personal opinion is that the group should pick up a namespace and
implement missing 2.0 classes or do some 1.1 classlib work.

--
Ivan N. Zlatev

Web: http://www.i-nZ.net
GPG Key: http://files.i-nZ.net/i-nZ.asc
"It's all some kind of whacked out conspiracy."