[Mono-dev] Another COM Interop Patch

[Zoltan Varga]

This is ok to check in.

      Zoltan

On 8/10/06, Jon Chambers <joncham at gmail.com> wrote:
> Slightly modified patch. I did make MonoType.IsCOMObjectImpl an internal
> call. Also, I fixed a problem with calling the constructor of RCWs (both
> order, and the fact that I was always calling the default/empty .ctor). As
> indicated in ChangeLog, all contributions are under the MIT/X11 license.
>
> - Jonathan
>
>
> On 8/9/06, Zoltan Varga <vargaz at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is ok to check in.
> >
> >    Zoltan
> >
> > On 8/9/06, Jon Chambers <joncham at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Here is another patch for COM Interop.
> > >
> > > 1. Corrected marshalling when MarshalAs is specified as IDispatch or
> > > IUnknown.
> > > 2. Added null checks to marshalling code
> > > 3. Added is_com_object field to classes. This is required because it is
> > > possible to derive from a ComImport attributed type. Thus the current
> type
> > > where the method is defined is not marked with the attribute, but a
> > > supertype is.
> > > 4. Added tests and fixed QueryInterface implementation so that test runs
> > > successfully on .Net.
> > > 5. Fixed cominterop_get_com_slot_for_method to look on
> > > interface where method is defined, not on implementing class, for
> > > attributes.
> > >
> > > The only minor thing is whether I should have IsCOMObjectImpl be an
> internal
> > > call and simply check the is_com_object flag of the class? This seems to
> > > make sense, but not sure whether I should add an internal call if I can
> do
> > > it in managed (albeit less efficiently).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > >
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>